Smuts asks the same question that seems to keep coming up again and again, are video games art? He states that this question has not been addressed in philosophy of art field, despite it being asked over and over by players, developers and game studies scholars.
My personal opinion is yes, of course games like any medium can be art, but the more interesting question as Smuts raises, is what kind? i.e., what are the aesthetics of game play? This has to be a plural answer as the nature of interactivity and play varies with each game. It is possible to talk about the aesthetics of ludus and paidia as many have before, and about the aesthetics of embodiment as I have in my MA thesis, but to subsume all video game play under a single, comprehensive umbrella would be too broad to be useful.
Ebert, Roger. Games vs. Art: Ebert vs. Barker
gamepolitics. Are Video Games Art?
Musgrove, Mike. Monster Fun. But Is It Art?
Ochalla, Bryan. Are Games Art? (Here We Go Again...)
Smuts, Aaron. Are Video Games Art?
Smuts, Aaron. Video Games and the Philosophy of Art
tmenezes. Are Games Art?
White, Gareth. Embodied Evil - The Aesthetics of Embodiment in Resident Evil 4: Wii Edition (University of the West of England, 20th August 2007).
Tuesday, 2 October 2007
Are Video Games Art?
Posted by Gareth R. White at 12:28
Labels: art, video game
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment